Being Omniscient




Not so long ago I was at a Staten Island bookseller and I perused, as I often do, the physics shelf.  Physics is a topic that I’ve always been interested in but have only a minor understanding of, so I thought I’d pick up a book whose aim is clear; to get someone who has no scientific training to become interested in science.  I found that book…it was called “How to Fossilize your Hamster: And Other Amazing Experiments for the Armchair Scientist” by Mick O’Hare.  Being a rabid enthusiast of all things chocolate I flipped to the chapter about how to measure the speed of light using a chocolate bar and your microwave.  It’s quite a neat trick, really, and very simple, and I’ll not spoil it now, since I think it will be more fun for you to sit and wonder how the hell this is possible for a while.  Sooner or later you’ll look for that book and read about it yourself.



The experiment itself is not my focus but rather something that was triggered in my mind.  Let me give a little background: I took a course in electronics math a decade or so ago and it fascinated me that the metric system applied to time in such a strange way.  I mean, we all know what a second is, and anyone who grew up in the 80s had a digital watch complete with  a stopwatch that could track 1/100’s of seconds.  But in this class we would describe and attempt to measure effects in not only milliseconds, but micro-, nano-, even PICOseconds (a pico second is one-TRILLIONTH of a second).  It amazed me that things happened on this time scale.

Later in life I became interested in religion and the supernatural, as well as ethical topics.  One issue seemed to tie all of those interests together.  It was a claim that I had heard pro-life (or as I called them at the time ‘anti-choice’) advocates use when describing WHY abortion is so evil.  It goes back to a claim made by the Vatican, that the soul enters the body at the point of conception, and that once something has a human soul, to kill it would be murder.

Well of course as I later studied in biology, all of life’s little happenings are PROCESSES.  That is to say, events don’t happen instantaneously, but rather they occur in time.  This is something we often don’t realize because our perception is such that we only see things on a very limited scale.  The concept of a 14 billion year old universe is baffling to most, and the same can be said for smaller increments of time.  I had read in an article written by the great neurologist Oliver Sacks, titled “In the River of Consciousness,” that the human mind does not see things in true realtime.  Rather, Sacks says, our minds take snapshots, and they do it approximately 200 times per second.  Our mind gives us a movie, essentially.  It might be said that we see in “reel” time, with 200 still images being displayed every second that goes by.  Of course, what this means is that every thing that occurs in between those still images is lost to our senses.  Portions of time representing fractions of milliseconds simply do not compute; we cannot comprehend them. So while the flick of a switch seems to INSTANTLY turn your lights on, it simply is not the case.  Nor would a human see, as a fly might, the flickering oscillation of flourescent kitchen lights.



Nor is it the case that there can be a “point” of conception, an argument that earned me a lot of disdainful looks in a social ethics course that I took some time ago while debating the merits of the Pope’s comments on abortion with my Catholic professor in a science-deprived, all-Christian classroom setting. I attempted to argue that conception was not a moment, but rather a PROCESS.  One cannot define the point of conception so easily, for one may wonder if conception occurs at the point a sperm enters an egg, or (VERY shortly) later when the sperm’s DNA is analyzed by the oocyte’s organelles, or later still when the sperm’s DNA is being BUILT by the egg and if so at what time during this building session would we designate as “the moment?”  Or does conception occur when the the egg divides, forming two completely new and novel recombinations of DNA that will likely result in a unique individual?  We are talking about chemical reactions here, and they happen quick.  To be sure, there is a point where we will finally say, “yes, this woman has conceived,” but drawing the line as to precisely when it happened requires us to make a completely arbitrary value judgment, which is what the “point of conception” argument was attempting to avoid in the first place.

I hope you have stuck with me through my admittedly tangential style…I assure I will return to my loose ends.

My reading of the Hamster book discussed the wavelength of light produced by microwaves.  The author claimed as have several other authors who have written on similar topics, that the standard microwave oven should have a sticker on it somewhere identifying that it operates at 2.45 GHz.  This places the frequency of the light wave at 2,450,000,000 cycles per second.  Going back to my training with electronics, as well as an audiology course I had recently failed, I recalled that a cycle has several noteworthy points within it, namely the peak, the trough, and the neutral point, which happens twice per cycle.  So here I am, a little tiny guy riding the light wave, and I decide to scratch a line in my notebook each time the light beam is in the neutral phase, the trough, or the peak…in ONE SECOND I have penciled in nearly 10 billion tick marks!!!  There are therefore AT LEAST that many discrete peices that a second can be divided into that I can account for via my very tiny Mead notebook.

BLAH BLAH BLAH…where the hell is this guy going with this…?

Well, I’ll continue this discussion later in my next post coming very soon, but suffice it to say that I will discuss the implications that this has on what it means to be an omniscient being, like “they” say their gods are, and what that means for free will.  I won’t go any deeper than I have on any other post, and it’s been such a long time since I have posted that I am pretty sure that I am once again my only reader, but hey…thanks for reading.


2 Responses to “Being Omniscient”

  1. i just found your blog and i love reading it- i want to post a link to it on my blog if you do not mind– keep posting

  2. By all means, post a link. I would appreciate all the exposure you can give. In fact, feel free to post a link to your own page in the comments section, and with your permission I may even place it on the blogroll once I understand what that means.

    Thanks for the input!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: